National Financial Research
How Does Your FQHC Compare?
No Margin. No Mission.
What do 1,139 health centers reveal about financial sustainability, revenue realization, and the capacity to protect every dollar? Explore what the national numbers mean for FQHC leadership.
National findings, relevant comparisons, and executive insights.
No patient information required. Immediate PDF access after submission.
Thank you! Your report is downloading now.
Preparing your download…
Download the Report (PDF)Want to know what's behind your own numbers? Request a Complimentary Revenue Cycle Analysis
Executive Summary
Nearly half of eligible health centers reported operating losses. When margins are this thin, even small setbacks change the decisions leaders face.
Operating margin: 1,139 eligible verified Form 990s. The reported-cash measure is a public-data proxy, not unrestricted liquidity.
Synergy assembled HRSA UDS data and verified IRS Form 990 filings to examine how financial performance varies by region, organizational size, and peer group.
Inside the Report
A preview of the evidence and issues covered in the full publication.
01 / Financial performance
Sixty-two health centers reported positive total margins while losing money on operations.
Does your bottom line tell the whole story?
01 | Inside the report
A positive bottom line
can hide operating losses.
Operating margin vs. total margin
Based on 1,139 centers with verified comparable Form 990 records.
02 / Stronger-margin centers
Explore how patient revenue coverage, expenses, and operating margins relate across peer groups.
What distinguishes financially stronger centers?
02 | Inside the report
Better margins are not
simply about lower costs.
Compare the measures that influence financial sustainability.
03 / Financial resilience
Our research identified 168 centers with an operating loss and fewer than 30 reported days cash.
How resilient is your financial position?
03 | Inside the report
Margin is performance.
Cash is breathing room.
A combined view of operating results and reported cash.
Public data cash proxy; not a measure of unrestricted liquidity.
04 / Revenue realization
The median reporting center received $63.52 for every $100 billed across all payers.
Does your collection report tell the full story?
04 | Inside the report
Billed charges are not
the same as payments.
Median dollars received per $100 billed
These ratios do not measure unpaid reimbursement or revenue that is legitimately owed.
05 / Claims intelligence
Denials, underpayments, and adjustments sometimes require claim-level investigation.
What can disappear from A/R without being resolved?
05 | Inside the report
Not every claim issue
appears on a dashboard.
A closer review separates unresolved balances from legitimate write-offs.
Review establishes whether additional reimbursement may be owed and reasonably collectable.
06 / No Claim Left Behind
New claims compete with older denials and unresolved balances for limited staff capacity.
Do you have enough capacity to follow through?
06 | Inside the report
No Claim Left Behind.
Capacity is a strategic decision.
A billing department has finite time. Unresolved claims still need a decision.
07 / Revenue cycle value
Public benchmarks reveal patterns. Your own claims and payments reveal your circumstances.
How much of your A/R is realistically collectable?
07 | Inside the report
National benchmarks
start the conversation.
Question 01
How much A/R is
realistically collectable?
Question 02
How much patient service
revenue should we receive?
Research for FQHC leadership
Bring better questions to your next executive or board discussion. Read the full national Benchmark Report.
Complimentary research. No obligation.
Thank you! Your report is downloading now.
Preparing your download…
Download the Report (PDF)Want to know what's behind your own numbers? Request a Complimentary Revenue Cycle Analysis
Explore articles that examine individual findings, challenge conventional performance measures,
and translate the research into practical leadership questions.
Articles
How does your FQHC compare? What the financial data tells us about community health centers
What 1,139 Health Centers Reveal About FQHC Financial Sustainability
National and regional financial findings, operating and total margins, reported liquidity, revenue realization, selected peer comparisons, staffing and productivity perspectives, and methodology notes.
HRSA UDS data and verified IRS Form 990 financial records. The research covers 1,356 HRSA-funded centers, including 1,139 with verified comparable financial filings. Eligible reporting populations vary by measure.
The report explores national, regional, patient-volume, and selected peer group comparisons, with research limitations described.
No. This download is the national research report. It does not instantly produce an individual center scorecard.
No. Public comparisons cannot establish the cause of a financial difference or determine underpayments for an individual center.
No. The report is complimentary and requires no services engagement.
The Benchmark Report analyzes public data across health centers. A separate Complimentary Revenue Cycle Analysis reviews your organization's own claims, payments, adjustments, denials, and A/R to investigate specific reimbursement questions.